Web Content Viewer - Fixed Context

Subtalar Arthroereisis

Policy Number: MA 1.114

Clinical Benefit

  • Minimize safety risk or concern.
  • Minimize harmful or ineffective interventions.
  • Assure appropriate level of care.
  • Assure appropriate duration of service for interventions.
  • Assure that recommended medical prerequisites have been met.
  • Assure appropriate site of treatment or service.

Effective Date: 1/1/2026

Policy

Subtalar arthroereisis is considered investigational as there is insufficient evidence to support a general conclusion concerning the health outcomes or benefits associated with this procedure.

Product Variations

This policy is only applicable to certain programs and products administered by Capital Blue Cross and subject to benefit variations. Please see additional information below.

FEP PPO – Refer to FEP Medical Policy Manual.

Description/Background

Subtalar arthroereisis has been performed for more than 50 years, with a variety of implant designs and compositions. The Maxwell-Brancheau Arthroereisis implant is the most frequently used, although other devices such as the HyProCure® subtalar arthroereisis implant, and Kalix® devices are also available. The Maxwell-Brancheau Arthroereisis implant is designed to be reversible and easy to insert, while the additional advantage is that it does not require bone cement. In children, insertion of the Maxwell-Brancheau Arthroereisis implant may be offered as a standalone procedure, although often used in combination with other procedures to correct additional deformities.

Regulatory Status

A number of implants have been cleared for marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration through the 510(k) process, and are summarized in Table 1. In general, these devices are indicated for insertion into the sinus tarsi of the foot, allowing normal subtalar joint motion while blocking excessive pronation.

Table 1. Representative Subtalar Implant Devices Cleared by FDA

Device
Manufacturer
Date
510(k)

Subtalar MBA®

Integra LifeSciences

07/96

K960692

OsteoMed Subtalar Implant System

OsteoMed

08/03

K031155

BioPro Subtalar Implant

BioPro

09/04

K041936

HyProCure Subtalar Implant System

Graham Medical Technologies

09/04

K042030

MBA Resorb Implant

Kinetikos Medical

09/05

K051611

Metasurg Subtalar Implant

Metasurg

05/07

K070441

Subtalar Implant

Biomet Sports Medicine

07/07

K071498

Arthrex ProStop Plus Arthroereisis Subtalar Implant

Arthrex

01/08

K071456

Trilliant Surgical Subtalar Implant

Trilliant Surgical

02/11

K103183

Metasurg Subtalar Implant

Metasurg

08/11

K111265

NuGait™ Subtalar Implant System

Ascension Orthopedic

08/11

K111799

Disco Subtalar Implant

Trilliant Surgical

12/11

K111834

OsteoSpring FootJack Subtalar Implant System

OsteoSpring Medical

12/11

K112658

IFS Subtalar Implant

Internal Fixation Systems

12/11

K113399

The Life Spine Subtalar Implant System

Life Spine

06/16

K160169

An FDA 510(k) database search product code HWC (03/08/18).

Rationale

Summary of Evidence

For individuals who have flatfoot who receive STA, the evidence includes mainly single-arm case series and a small nonrandomized controlled trial comparing STA with lateral column calcaneal lengthening. Relevant outcomes are symptoms, functional outcomes, and quality of life. The small nonrandomized comparative trial (n=24 feet) is considered preliminary, and interpretation of the case series evidence is limited by the lack of adequate comparators in addition to STA, creating difficulties in determining the extent to which each modality contributes to the outcomes. Another limitation of the published data is the lack of long-term outcomes, which is of particular importance because the procedure is often performed in growing children. Although some authors have reported rates of symptom improvement, the current evidence is insufficient to determine the effects of the technology on health outcomes.

For individuals who have talar subluxation joint dislocation who receive subtalar arthroereisis, the evidence consists of 1 prospective, single-arm study of talocalcaneal stabilization using HyProCure®. Relevant outcomes are symptoms, functional outcomes, and quality of life. Although improvements in pain and function were observed, the current evidence on the use of subtalar arthroereisis for treatment of talar subluxation joint dislocation is insufficient to draw conclusions about treatment effectiveness. The evidence is insufficient to determine that the technology results in an improvement in the net health outcome.

Definitions

Calcaneus is the largest of the tarsal bones situated at the lower and back part of the foot forming the heel.

Talus is the ankle bone; the bone of the tarsus which articulates with the tibia at the ankle.

Disclaimer

Capital Blue Cross’ medical policies are used to determine coverage for specific medical technologies, procedures, equipment, and services. These medical policies do not constitute medical advice and are subject to change as required by law or applicable clinical evidence from independent treatment guidelines. Treating providers are solely responsible for medical advice and treatment of members. These policies are not a guarantee of coverage or payment. Payment of claims is subject to a determination regarding the member’s benefit program and eligibility on the date of service, and a determination that the services are medically necessary and appropriate. Final processing of a claim is based upon the terms of contract that applies to the members’ benefit program, including benefit limitations and exclusions. If a provider or a member has a question concerning this medical policy, please contact Capital Blue Cross’ Provider Services or Member Services.

Coding Information

Note: This list of codes may not be all-inclusive, and codes are subject to change at any time. The identification of a code in this section does not denote coverage as coverage is determined by the terms of member benefit information. In addition, not all covered services are eligible for separate reimbursement. The codes need to be in numerical order.

Investigational; therefore, not covered:

Procedure Codes

0335T

0510T

0511T

28899

 

References

  1. Chong DY, Macwilliams BA, Hennessey TA, et al. Prospective comparison of subtalar arthroereisis with lateral column lengthening for painful flatfeet. J Pediatr Orthop B. Jul 2015;24(4):345-353. PMID 25856275
  2. Metcalfe SA, Bowling FL, Reeves ND. Subtalar joint arthroereisis in the management of pediatric flexible flatfoot: a critical review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int. Dec 2011;32(12):1127-1139. PMID 22381197
  3. Graham ME, Jawrani NT, Chikka A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure(R) in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up. J Foot Ankle Surg. Jan-Feb 2012;51(1):23-29. PMID 22196455
  4. Vedantam R, Capelli AM, Schoenecker PL. Subtalar arthroereisis for the correction of planovalgus foot in children with neuromuscular disorders. J Pediatr Orthop. May-Jun 1998;18(3):294-298. PMID 9600551
  5. Nelson SC, Haycock DM, Little ER. Flexible flatfoot treatment with arthroereisis: radiographic improvement and child health survey analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. May-Jun 2004;43(3):144-155. PMID 15181430
  6. Needleman RL. A surgical approach for flexible flatfeet in adults including a subtalar arthroereisis with the MBA sinus tarsi implant. Foot Ankle Int. Jan 2006;27(1):9-18. PMID 16442023
  7. Cicchinelli LD, Pascual Huerta J, Garcia Carmona FJ, et al. Analysis of gastrocnemius recession and medial column procedures as adjuncts in arthroereisis for the correction of pediatric pes planovalgus: a radiographic retrospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg. Sep-Oct 2008;47(5):385-391. PMID 18725117
  8. Lucaccini C, Zambianchi N, Zanotti G. Distal osteotomy of the first metatarsal bone in association with sub-talar arthroerisis, for hallux valgus correction in abnormal pronation syndrome. Chir Organi Mov. Dec 2008;92(3):145-148. PMID 19082522
  9. Scharer BM, Black BE, Sockrider N. Treatment of painful pediatric flatfoot with Maxwell-Brancheau subtalar arthroereisis implant a retrospective radiographic review. Foot Ankle Spec. Apr 2010;3(2):67-72. PMID 20400415
  10. Brancheau SP, Walker KM, Northcutt DR. An analysis of outcomes after use of the Maxwell-Brancheau Arthroereisis implant. J Foot Ankle Surg. Jan-Feb 2012;51(1):3-8. PMID 22196453
  11. Bresnahan PJ, Chariton JT, Vedpathak A. Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure(R): preliminary clinical outcomes of a prospective case series. J Foot Ankle Surg. Mar-Apr 2013;52(2):195-202. PMID 23313499
  12. Scher DM, Bansal M, Handler-Matasar S, et al. Extensive implant reaction in failed subtalar joint arthroereisis: report of two cases. HSS J. Sep 2007;3(2):177-181. PMID 18751791
  13. Saxena A, Nguyen A. Preliminary radiographic findings and sizing implications on patients undergoing bioabsorbable subtalar arthroereisis. J Foot Ankle Surg. May-Jun 2007;46(3):175-180. PMID 17466243
  14. Cook EA, Cook JJ, Basile P. Identifying risk factors in subtalar arthroereisis explantation: a propensity-matched analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. Jul-Aug 2011;50(4):395-401. PMID 21708340
  15. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Sinus Tarsi Implant Insertion for Mobile Flatfoot [IPG305]. 2009
  16. Harris EJ, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline Pediatric Flatfoot Panel: American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS). Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. Nov-Dec 2004;43(6):341-373. PMID 15605048
  17. Lee MS, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline Adult Flatfoot Panel: American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS). Diagnosis and treatment of adult flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. Mar-Apr 2005;44(2):78-113. PMID 15768358
  18. Ghali, A., Mhapankar, A., Momtaz, D., Driggs, B., Thabet, A. M., & Abdelgawad, A. (2022). Arthroereisis: Treatment of Pes Planus. Cureus, 14(1), e21003.
  19. Turner C, Gardiner MD, Midgley A, Stefanis A. A guide to the management of paediatric pes planus. Aust J Gen Pract. 2020;49(5):245-249. doi:10.31128/AJGP-09-19-5089
  20. Piraino JA, Theodoulou MH, Ortiz J, et al. American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Clinical Consensus Statement: Appropriate Clinical Management of Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 59(2): 347-355. PMID 32131002
  21. Bernasconi A, Lintz F, Sadile F. The role of arthroereisis of the subtalar joint for flatfoot in children and adults. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(11):438-446. Published 2017 Nov 8. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.2.170009

Policy History

  • MA 1.114
    • 8/5/2025 Creation of policy.

Web Content Viewer - Fixed Context

Updated January 1, 2026

Y0016_26WBST_M